To be fair, this is the situation in our world today, and has always been the case throughout recorded history. Beach Weddings in Karachi are the New Trend. Yes, i am a man, and as a man I am ashamed of my sex for the irrisponsible way we rule our world. But women do have brains, and are capable of outsmarting men. Actually human males care about a million times more about their offspring than almost all other species. Therefore all men are peaceful. Get over yourselves and realize that it takes both parties to make a functioning government and society. Nearly all crimes if violence are also commmitted by men. For men, it is youth and beauty, for women it is power, status and material wealth. A world ruled by women, is far less likely to go to war.. As long as you don't see what's wrong with that, then there's not point in discussing it. Besides, women are quite capable of those things too. That is complete bullshit, and it disrespects and dishonors the real daughters of mother's who were raised in Matriarchal households! You stated that "most men who seek to invent or innovate are not "given" the tools, money, education and encouragement to do this. Flexibility & Scalability; Regulatory Compliance. The biggest and strongest stag gets to mate with most of the females and those who are not strong enough, never get the chance to mate. If this is true, this means it is impossible to solve basic problems like war, crime and poverty. This statement comes from a grave misconception of what causes wars. It is true some human men do help with caring for the young but many will also leave the female when she is pregnant or has his child and will strongly resist paying maintenance for his own children. yes, these atrocities were mostly committed by men but that does not mean that the majority of men would want to do such things. Disadvantages Of An MRI Scan. So what is wrong in making it easier for women to get into power? After all, in a scenario where women rule . This fierce competitive instinct also creates very unequal societies as well. There are still a variety of risks involved in using an MRI scan despite its overall beneficial use. Who invented the atom bomb? What IS an obvious difference is that matriarchal societies had women making the decisions. Ian Stuart Robertson from London England on December 08, 2015: I was in a pub in London's Stoke Newington which features a gallery of famous people who've lived there. Criticism is not the problem. It has been men who have ruled all our all our countries in that time, so if it has nothing to do with men, then whose fault is it? Aggression is just the willingness to take action and competitiveness is what drives the standard up. "Certainly no man would do this. You need to look at what is happening to the world without the patriarchal blindfold. It is women maternal and nurturing instincts that would make women far better rulers of our world, as they would care far more about the people they rule, than male rulers. 1. It make sense for our world to be rule by nuturing and maternal people and not the most competitive people like we have throughout our history. The fact is that if you allow men to rule countries, as history shows, they have a tendency to want to conquer, invade or start wars, with other countries. A woman will serve almost equal time as a man for shoplifting, but for something like murder, she enjoys a huge gendered discount in criminal court. Such marriage practice has many positive outcomes. This is just another sexist rant filled with misandry. Sorry to say, if you think women are superior and have these sort of fantasies, you are a disgrace to nature and are weak both physically and mentally. A project powered and managed by Maven Logix Pvt Ltd. That sounds like a perfect Orwellian nightmare. As for the rest, I agree that this is starting to go around in circles but that is because you ignored my points and just responded by repeating your initial statements. And yes, patriarchy has evolved to the degree we now have democracy in some countries of our world. I completely agree with this article, thank you for your insight. Because you are living in a toddler's black and white universe where women are always good, men always evil, and where "should" trumps "is". Hence it is matrilineal in descent. Yes, men have created democracy and tried to create equal societies and tried to stop wars, but what is very noticeable, is how they have failed in this. Yes im finding it amazing that nothing has been done about this - that more people are not wanting this change! A number of characteristics that distinguish women leaders from men when it comes to qualities of leadership: Women leaders are more assertive and persuasive, have a stronger need to get things done and are more willing to take risks than male leaders.Women leaders were also found to be more empathetic and flexible, as well as stronger in interpersonal skills than their male counterparts.enabling them to read situations accurately and take information in from all sides.These women leaders are able to bring others around to their point of view.because they genuinely understand and care about where others are coming from.so that the people they are leading feel more understood, supported and valued. You seem to see them as a monolithic object/victim class. Nothing wrong with that. Teaching boys to hate their own sex is a sure way to make things worse, not better. When you go on about how men ruling the world has been such a disaster, you're making the assumption that it is because they're men that it resulted in disaster. This greater interests has been demonstrated by Dr. Simon Baron Cohen to begin as early as the neo-nate stage: newborn boys stare longer at mechanical objects, and newborn girls stare longer at faces. It would be far better if men stop looking for scapegoats for the world's problems and blame each other and look at themselves and men in general. Youre still regurgitating the same fallacious reasoning I see. In other words, all the resources provided by nature are for exploitation. Then only on paper would women rule the world and only as long as men, the actual ones in power, allow it. It is nearly always men, and this is to do with the male competitive instinct.". Are you saying that it would be political correct to say, "people do a really terrible job in ruling our world". Furthermore, this system is quite liberal to research, development, and change. Whilst Ms Greer is highly educated and thinks carefully before She articulates i'm still not sure if Ms Greer is advocating a Female led society but She does raise relevant topics from time to time. Einstein was a poor student. But a very great deal is instigated by women. To say that men and women are more different than similar just couldn't be more false anyway. The only reason why matriarchy is possible now, is that we now have democractic goverments.". Was it men or women? "No govement dominated by women will want to see children in the country they rule live in poverty and ignorance. This works well because they avoid risk in a fight themselves but still have a man or group of men beaten to a pulp by the man or men she got to fight for her. He was the one with the last name and the sword, so it was all him. Before we had democracy, it would have been impossible for women to rule any country, because men ruled through violence and intimidation, and women would find it hard to compete with men in a world of violence, It is true we have had, in the past, Queens like Elizabeth 1 of England and Catherine the Great of Russia, but they had to still rule governments, dominated by men with male values. As for saying a lot of these acts of male violence is caused by women. Hi Mary Wednesday, I think the reason why you have more black men in prisons, is because most of them live in poverty. As a result, supporters of patriarchy pay no heed to preserve nature. In most mammal species the males have nothing, or very little to do with this. It is patrairchal rule that is holding back human progress, our world can never become a better place while men continue to rule it. Are you saying that people are intentionally voting for uncaring politicians? I also wonder how it is that you don't see yourself as ultimately patriarchal. So what is wrong in making it easier for women to get into power?. Following the argument of my main work, Matriarchy, which is in the process of being published in several consecutive volumes, I briefly want to present my theory of matriarchal society. This goes against the principles laid down by the religious beliefs and practices. Do you do so for the sake of argument, that you may gain some satisfaction in asserting your bias as well as your social and political views where it naturally doesn't belong nor is wanted? Copyright @2022 All Right Reserved Designed and Developed by Maven Logix, Patriarchy Vs Matriarchy: Understanding the Difference, Pros and Cons of Patriarchy vs Matriarchy, Superwomen breaking the myths and handed-down opinions, The desi dad syndrome that every middle-class kid can relate to, 20 Things That Pakistani Millennials Miss From Their Childhood. Who is more diverse anyway? That they have had no effect on the men in their lives, and played no part in maintaining and enforcing gender roles and perpetuating them on the next generation. The point is that as history shows us, we don't want ruthless, aggressive, violent and competitive people rule our world.. The only political system that has noticeably improved the lives of the people has been democracy, even though wars and inequality are still commonplace in democratic countries. Patriarchy, on the other hand, is a social system, wherein males enjoy all the powers, control, and authority, and women are given subordinate roles. William Bond (author) from England on July 10, 2012: I agree Aincas, that it should be obvious that men commit far, far more violence than women. Men's bodies produce far more testosterone than what women's bodies do and it is this hormone that makes a man's body physically stronger. Besides, women already do the biggest part in shaping men. People vote the most convincing actor or actress. The Afican-Amercan culture is a matriarchy and very violent. Women then have the choice of either giving away their power, or to learn to be as assertive and competitive as men. His culture is practical, rational, war-like, aggressive, and authoritarian. Even if a political matriarchy was achievable in a democracy (which I don't think it is), it would depend on the entire rest of the world being peaceful to survive. A Matriarch is essentially a strong woman, a good woman who is responsible, reliable, dependable; she is the head of household and is considered the heart, soul, and leader of the family in a heterosexual family unit, regardless if the father is a stay at home dad, or the breadwinner, the mother respectively is always head of household and the blood always flows through her line, and no, its not bullshit, I'm living breathing proof of it! It is nearly always men, and this is to do with the male competitive instinct. To rectify this disparity, gender equality professionals do not advocate for a matriarchy or for radical actions like for women to stage coup d'etats. And the problem with sexism is, that it creates a foundation upon which you can make any gender discriminating case you want. This as well, should be supported by valid points, and the daily . Tesla lived and died a pauper. It can be initiated at will and ended in the same manner. Lack of economic support. Wars were nearly always the result of competing cultures. Einstein was a poor student. Consumers can benefit from lower prices and better quality goods and services due to the competitiveness of the firms. A similar thing happened to Jocelyn Bell, it was she who first discovered Neutron stars, but it was her male boss who got the Nobel Prize, for not doing anything. This is what terrifies me about people like you. Women will never be as competitive and aggressive as men. And the reason for this, is that men have a strong aggressive and competitive instinct whereas women have a powerful maternal instinct. There has never been in history a case of an Amazon army of women that set out to conquer the world, but this has happened many times with men. Feminism is both an intellectual commitment and a political movement . There is a much more justified and equal distribution of roles, responsibilities and duties. You just will not see the fallacy in the conclusion: "if most of xyz are men, therefore most men are xyz". Women who are not dominated by oppressive patriarchal societies are more able to express their nurturing and loving natures. The Feminist idea that women need to learn to be as aggressive and competitive as men is nuts. Show me any woman who has solved such problems and it's not like there haven't been any female political leaders who had the chance. Body paragraphs. We live in a world of fear and hatred which can boil over into warfare at any time. This change would be challenging the established doctrines of masculine dominance over women. But I am not talking about the way women and men have been brainwashed into thinking patriarchy is wonderful. Advantages (Pros / Positives / Benefits) of Monopoly Market. We've been through that and I've explained my position before. In the animal world it is very rare to see female animals fight each other unless they are a carnivorous animal. Yes, violent men always make this excuse. Can be a lengthy and noisy procedure. "Women do have better communication and social skills than men, which is another reason why they should be ruling our world.". If there is such a thing as collective guilt, then there should be collective kudos, no? To keep on repeating what I have previously said. They are isolated, poor, lack electricity or running water. Follow Us: One advantage of Maslow's hierarchy of needs is its perceptive insight into human nature, a disadvantage is that the hierarchy fails to account for cultural or social differences between individuals. Do you think that maybe the number of men who do not want the responsibility of caring for a child and walk away might be roughly equivalent to the number of women who abort, abandon, adopt out or kill their children? The reason would be that women have a powerful nurturing instinct. You said "You seem to feel that women have existed in a bubble through all of human history. Do you even realize what you just said? I personally think that the way to counter patriarchal propaganda is not for women to deny their maternal instincts and try and pretend they are like men. And remember, these TROs are unfounded or false--meaning the man did NOT brutalize the woman into behaving in this way. The reason would be to do with our basic instincts. There is a reason why women are attracted to powerful, dominant, 'alpha' men. Yes, there are a number of female inventors and scientists, but they never get the credit they deserve in our patriarchal world. Dont bother because that is also fallacious. If you can't see any of that, well, there's not a whole lot more to say. They did not require the system change to adapt to their preferences, because women are more likely to choose fields of study and vocation that involve organic and human systems. ". But throughout recorded history the one thing that hasnt been tried and that is Matriarchy. We live in an insane and brutal world because it is ruled by men who have an instinct to fight and compete with other men. Men are not permitted to be fathers to their children, and strong pair-bonding is forbidden in the serf class. Because of this, they are.what? Men have been ruling our world for the last five thousand years, and have successfully kept women away from all form of political and financial power. If poverty can be elimination, then crime for both black and white men will be greatly reduced. Youre shifting goalposts now. . But because they do not have an alternitive to it they are forced to vote for the status-quo. But this shouldn't be a problem because the only way a matrairchal government can get into power is through demcratic means. Then once we get into a violent situation we end up with psychopaths becoming leaders, because a psychopath is far more able to deal with violence than ordinary men. Also mentally it makes the average man far more aggressive than the average woman. You may be able to impress your friends. As for the reason why there is no matriarchies in recorded history the reasons is warfare. William Bond (author) from England on August 17, 2011: I am shocked and amazed at what you say. Patriarchy vs matriarchy, we will discuss their pros and cons. Do they never receive any recognition nor a Nobel Prize? To rise to power within a female only political system would require being just as competitive and ruthless as in anywhere else. Things can only change when we have matriarchal political parties where women are free to be themselves and not have men tell them how to behave. Wars have nothing to do with the sex of the people in power. It sounds like you just have an image in your head of what a woman should be like and that's what you compare your picture of men with. William Bond (author) from England on July 16, 2012: Hi girlwriteswhat, The actual reasons why women abort is because in patriarchal societies they do not have control over their own bodies. Can improve the overall chances in the lives of many people. Put women in power in a matriarchal government and they will want to nurture the people they rule. Hey you, go take that group's stuff and give it to me so my kids will have a successful upbringing!". I already answered this several times.
Adults Only Resorts Near Houston, Articles A